My biggest fear about people discovering Hannibal on Netflix right now is that they won't do it right. If you're not wearing a flower crown and shouting, "Swiggity swag, the nightmare stag!" at the screen, you're just not getting the full experience.

without having seen the last episode of the season, ( here's what I think's gonna happen on Hannibal next season )

How I view most of the debate over Hannibal:

Fan1: OMG, I hate how people think that Hannibal cares about Will. He doesn't! He just wants to break his mind and play with the pieces.
Fan2: Yeah, but, Hannibal thinks that's what friendship is. Possession, control, and fucking someone up. I think Hannibal can care about Will and still try and break him into pieces. That's what makes this show so fascinating!
Fan1: STOP MAKING HANNIBAL A WOOBIE!
Fan2: ...

Sorry for not replying to comments. Just started tech week for the play, plus it's the last few days of school (two more days!!!! And guess who got a new student today?)

Anyway, when people tell me that they don't watch Hannibal because it's too hard to imagine anyone as Hannibal after Anthony Hopkins, I want to tell them to shut the fuck up because 1) they're stupid, 2) Hopkins kinda always bugged me as Lecter (I think I read the book first) and, c) that's such a stupid argument that we need to get past (especially from an actor). I mean, I freely admit that I was against Karl Urban as Dr. McCoy because I loved Deforest Kelley so much, but, you know what? Star Trek is different from ToS and it's a different character and interpretation. Same with Sherlock Holmes. And... other remakes and things (like BSG; and Batman; and Superman). People are willing to give those a chance.

So, yeah. If someone uses that argument, it is invalid.

All I have to say about "Fromage" ( BESIDES IT WAS TOTALLY AWESOME )

About Will's dogs. And their names (Widdle, Waddle, Piddle, Puddle, Little Bark, Winston, and ... something).

Because of reasons.